Effectiveness Of Cervical Stabilization Exercises With Feedback On Respiratory Status In Chronic Neck Pain Patients With Forward Head Posture

Background: Chronic neck pain is observed to be commonly kindred with forward head posture (FHP). Rib cage mechanics is found to be altered that decreases thoracic mobility. This reduced mobility of thorax reduces the effectiveness of diaphragm, intercostals, and abdominal muscles in terms of ventilation. Therefore this study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of exercises meant for enhancing the stability of the neck with feedback on neck stabilization exercises with feedback in improving the respiratory status. Methods: This was an experimental study. Based on inclusion & exclusion criteria, 100 subjects (54 males and 46 females) enrolled for the study, which was further allotted into Experimental and Control groups. The experimental group was given Cervical Stabilization Exercise with feedback in addition to routine Physiotherapy treatment. Control group was given only regular Physiotherapy treatment for six weeks. The digital camera assessed the FHP by measuring of Craniovertebral Angle (CVA). Spirometry assessed pulmonary function (FEV1) and Micro RPM assessed inspiratory muscle strength (PImax). All measurements were taken on the day of study, on 3rd and 6th week Results: Significant reduction in forward head posture measured by improvement in Craniovertebral angle, improvement in Inspiratory muscle strength (PIMax) and pulmonary functions (FEV1) were found in the group that received cervical stabilization exercises with feedback along with the conventional Physiotherapy (p< 0.05). Therefore it is suggested that cervical stabilization exercises correct the head posture and helps to improve the biomechanics of respiratory muscles. Conclusion: Cervical stabilization exercise is an effective approach to correct the forward head posture, and it should be included in the intervention measures of patients with forward head posture.

Coronary stent implantation without lesion predilatation (direct stenting): our experience with this evolving technique.

BACKGROUND: Until recently, conventional intracoronary stent deployment required predilatation of the lesion with a balloon. However, "direct stenting" of the lesion without predilatation offers certain theoretical and practical advantages. We assessed the safety and feasibility of direct stenting in a select group of patients who were likely to benefit most from these advantages, namely, those with acute coronary syndromes. saphenous vein graft lesions, associated renal or left ventricular dysfunction and those requiring multivessel intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: After direct stenting, intravascular ultrasound was used to assess the adequacy of stent expansion in 51 patients. One hundred and twenty patients with a total of 125 lesions (83.3% males, average age 54.6+/-12.4 years) were enrolled for direct stenting. Of these, 90% of patients had presented with acute coronary syndromes, 21.6% of patients had associated moderate-to-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 6.7% of patients had associated renal dysfunction and 30.8% of patients required multivessel intervention. Angiographically visible thrombus was present in 35.2% of patients. The mean reference diameter of the lesion was 3.18+/-0.32 mm and mean percentage diameter stenosis was 76.4+/-11.2%. Almost all varieties of stents were used (8.8% bare and 91.2% mounted). Procedural success was achieved in 98.3% of patients (98.4% of lesions). In two cases, the lesion had to be predilated prior to stenting. On angiography, the need for postdilatation of the stent was apparent in 29 (23.6%) lesions. In contrast, on intravascular ultrasound evaluation done in 51 lesions after stent deployment, the need for postdilatation to optimize stent expansion was seen in 43 (84.3%) lesions. There was one instance of acute stent thrombosis and two instances of slow-flow phenomenon. There were no deaths, myocardial infarction or need for urgent bypass surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that direct stenting is feasible and safe in selected groups of patients. Optimization of stent expansion after direct stenting may often require aggressive postdilatation.

Coronary stent thrombosis: time course and clinical outcome.

The current clinical practice of stent implantation has changed over the last few years. We analysed the incidence and time course of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing successful coronary angioplasty and stenting over the last three years. All the patients were treated with aspirin and ticlopidine. A total of 13 patients experienced stent thrombosis. The mean age was 52+/-12 years; 12 were smokers and 10 had a recent history of myocardial infarction. None of these patients had received abciximab. The median time from stent implantation to stent thrombosis was 10 hours, with all the stent occlusions occurring within 18 hours of stent implantation procedure. All the patients underwent a repeat intervention at a median time of 30 minutes after the clinical suspicion of stent occlusion. On follow-up of 1 to 24 months, three patients developed reocclusion. In the present era of coronary angioplasty and stenting, when interventional procedures are not pre-planned and patients are treated with aspirin and ticlopidine or clopidogrel at the time of stent implantation, the incidence of stent thrombosis is low; it is seen mainly in patients with recent myocardial infarction, majority of them being smokers, and occurs within 18 hours in all the patients.

Elective stenting of extracranial carotid arteries.

OBJECTIVES: In symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with significant carotid artery stenosis, surgical endarterectomy has been shown to be beneficial when compared with medical management. Carotid stenting is evolving as an alternative technique for treating such patients. This prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility and safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting. METHODS: Fourteen patients (15 carotid arteries) with significant carotid artery stenosis were enrolled. These patients were in the age range 46 to 84 years (mean 60.9 +/- 7 years) and there were 12 males (86%). All of these patients were symptomatic with either TIA (n = 8) or stroke (n = 6). Wallstents were used in all the cases to stent the carotid arteries. One patient underwent bilateral carotid artery stenting. RESULTS: Carotid angioplasty and stenting was successful in 13 out of 14 (92.8%) patients and 14 out of 15 (93.3%) carotid arteries, with reduction in mean (+/- SD) stenosis from 86 +/- 6% to 3 +/- 3%. There was one episode of minor stroke, no major stroke or death during the initial hospitalization. Another patient had a minor stroke with patent ipsilateral carotid artery (on repeat angiography) during the first 30 days after the procedure. This patient was also found to have asymptomatic thrombus formation in the contralateral carotid stent which resolved with intravenous anticoagulation. During a mean follow up of 6 +/- 2 months there has been no recurrence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Based upon our limited experience we believe that percutaneous carotid angioplasty with stenting is feasible with low periprocedural complication rate.

Outcomes of primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.

Primary coronary stenting is being increasingly used in patients undergoing primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. In this prospective study we analysed our experience of direct angioplasty in 76 patients with acute myocardial infarction of whom 65 received intracoronary stents using high pressure deployment (> or = 12 atm) with adjunctive aspirin and ticlopidine therapy but without coumadin. All patients underwent pre-discharge angiography. Stent implantation was successful in all patients. Stent thrombosis was not seen in any patient. However, TIMI grade 3 flow was obtained in only 58 (89.2%) patients with evidence of slow-flow present in the remaining seven patients. Pre-discharge angiograms showed no-stent thrombosis but five out of the seven (71%) patients with slow-flow phenomenon persisted to have slow-flow. These patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction as compared to patients with TIMI 3 flow at pre-discharge angiography (27.5 +/- 10.2% vs 42.1 +/- 15.2%; p < 0.001) and a high mortality (2 out of 7) within 30 days. Primary stenting is safe and feasible in the majority of patients with good short-term outcome. But persistent slow-flow phenomenon with adverse clinical outcome is seen in a small but significant number of patients.